Skip to main content
National News Desk
india

Complaint for remarks against PM Modi: HC refuses to quash 2019 summons to Rahul Gandhi

The Hindu NationalBy The Hindu National
8 Sept 2026
Original: English
Complaint for remarks against PM Modi: HC refuses to quash 2019 summons to Rahul Gandhi
Complaint for remarks against PM Modi: HC refuses to quash 2019 summons to Rahul Gandhi
Visual Coverage
AI Synopsis & Key Briefing

The High Court, however, continued its 2021 order directing the magistrate to defer hearing on the complaint for six weeks so that Mr. Gandhi can approach the Supreme Court in appeal

Key Highlights & Official Takeaways
  • The High Court, however, continued its 2021 order directing the magistrate to defer hearing on the complaint for six weeks so that Mr.
  • Gandhi's petition against the magistrate court's order.
  • The HC, however, continued its 2021 order directing the magistrate to defer hearing on the complaint for six weeks so that Mr.
  • Justice Borkar said the court did not find any "perversity and illegality" in the magistrate's order and hence no reason to interfere.
Comprehensive News & Policy Report

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday (September 8, 2026) refused to quash the summons issued to Congress MP Rahul Gandhi in 2019 in a defamation complaint over his remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whom he had called a "commander-in-thief".

A single bench of Justice N.R. Borkar dismissed Mr. Gandhi's petition against the magistrate court's order. The HC, however, continued its 2021 order directing the magistrate to defer hearing on the complaint for six weeks so that Mr.

Gandhi can approach the Supreme Court in appeal. Justice Borkar said the court did not find any "perversity and illegality" in the magistrate's order and hence no reason to interfere. "This court finds no infirmity in the order.

Hence, the petition is dismissed," the HC said. Mr. Gandhi, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, had challenged a Girgaum magistrate's order of August 28, 2019, for a process against him on a complaint filed by one M.H.

Shrishrimal, who claimed to be a member of the ruling BJP. The defamation complaint against the Congress leader had been filed for Mr. Gandhi's "commander-in-thief" remark against PM Modi in 2018 over the Rafale fighter jet deal.

The HC in November 2021 directed the magistrate to defer the hearing on the defamation complaint, which meant the Congress leader would not be required to appear before the magistrate. The complaint had alleged that Mr. Gandhi defamed PM Modi in a public speech in September 2018 in Rajasthan.

Mr. Gandhi's counsel, Sudeep Pasbola and advocate Kushal Mor, argued that the complaint was frivolous and the complainant had no locus standi to file it. The complainant was not an aggrieved party and hence cannot file such a complaint, they had submitted.

Mr. Shrishrimal, in his complaint, alleged that apart from the remarks during the rally against PM Modi, Mr. Gandhi had also posted a video on his personal X (formerly Twitter) account and referred to the Prime Minister as "commander-in-thief".

According to the complainant, these statements amounted to direct allegations of theft against all members of BJP and Indian citizens connected to PM Modi. Mr. Shrishrimal had opposed Mr. Gandhi's plea in the HC.

Actionable Steps for Aspirants & Citizens
  • Aspirants and citizens are advised to monitor official notices and circulars issued by The Hindu National.
  • Verify all prescribed eligibility criteria, cutoff dates, and authenticated document requirements prior to formal submissions.
  • Track connected examination timetables, vacancy advisories, and administrative gazettes on SuchnaSetu.
Official Notice Specification
Issuing AuthorityThe Hindu National
Topic CategoryINDIA
JurisdictionAll India / National
Publication Date8 September 2026
Connected Government Jobs & Upcoming Exams
Active on SuchnaSetu
Official Source Attribution: The Hindu National
View Publisher Source Link

SuchnaSetu provides verified civic and public policy reports based on official notices. Primary publication and copyright remain with the respective government authority or publisher.