‘Travesty to term it state-inflicted death’: India votes against UN death penalty moratorium
India objected to linking judicially mandated capital punishment with unlawful executions while speaking on the resolution concerning extrajudicial executions.
- ✓India objected to linking judicially mandated capital punishment with unlawful executions while speaking on the resolution concerning extrajudicial executions.
- ✓Primary Authority: Official communique verified from Hindustan Times India.
- ✓Civic Domain: Categorized under world public notices.
India on Saturday voted against a United Nations General Assembly draft resolution calling for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, saying there was no international consensus against capital punishment and that every sovereign state had the right to determine its legal system and penalties.
Bhavika Mangalanandan, an Indian Foreign Service (IFS) officer serving as first secretary at India's Permanent Mission to the United Nations, objected to linking judicially mandated capital punishment with unlawful executions while speaking on the resolution on extrajudicial executions.
"There is no international consensus against capital punishment, and article six of the ICCPR permits its use with restrictions. Capital punishment is meted out after rigorous and due legal process," she was quoted as saying.
"It is therefore a travesty to term it state-inflicted death," Mangalanandan added. She further objected to the discussion of capital punishment under a resolution or report concerning extrajudicial and arbitrary executions, calling it "disingenuous and mischievous".
"To discuss this topic under a resolution or a report on extrajudicial and arbitrary execution is therefore disingenuous and mischievous, intended to portray personal ideological preferences as settled international law," she said.
"Extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions are unlawful and a clear violation of human rights. They deeply affect the families of victims and violate the most fundamental human right, the right to life," she said. "India therefore supported the adoption of the resolution that calls upon states to eradicate instances of such grave human rights violations," she added.
She clarified that India's objection was specifically directed at Operational Paragraph 6 (OP 6) of the resolution, which refers to a report by the Special Rapporteur presented to the Human Rights Council at its 62nd session and calls on states to take its recommendations into account.
"We strongly disagree with the assertion conveyed in the report of the Special Rapporteur and thereby through the resolution. The death penalty inherently constitutes torture or ill-treatment," Mangalanandan said. Explaining India's legal position, she noted that capital punishment is a statutory provision in the country and is imposed exclusively in the "rarest of rare" cases.
"In India, the death penalty is a statutory provision exercised exclusively in the rarest of rare cases; a legal framework guarantees multi-tier procedural safeguards, including the presumption of innocence, mandatory confirmation of death sentences by a higher court and extensive mitigation consideration," she said.
"In view of the above, my delegation is constrained to disassociate from OP six of the resolution," she added. Follow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times.
Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs.
The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals.
The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources.
Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More
- •Aspirants and citizens are advised to monitor official notices and circulars issued by Hindustan Times India.
- •Verify all prescribed eligibility criteria, cutoff dates, and authenticated document requirements prior to formal submissions.
- •Track connected examination timetables, vacancy advisories, and administrative gazettes on SuchnaSetu.
| Issuing Authority | Hindustan Times India |
|---|---|
| Topic Category | WORLD |
| Jurisdiction | All India / National |
| Publication Date | 14 November 2026 |