Skip to main content
National News Desk
world

'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN

Times of India NationalBy Aastha Jha
27 Oct 2026
Original: English
'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN
'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN
Visual Coverage
AI Synopsis & Key Briefing

'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN

Key Highlights & Official Takeaways
  • ✓'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN
  • ✓Over the life of this Organisation, the veto has been exercised 331 times on around 200 resolutions.
  • ✓Civic Domain: Categorized under world public notices.
Comprehensive News & Policy Report

NewsIndia News'Veto should be held by all permanent members': India at UN Edited by Aastha Jha / TIMESOFINDIA.COM / Oct 27, 2026, 08:31 IST Parvathaneni Harish called for comprehensive Security Council reforms, arguing that all permanent members of an expanded Council must have equal rights and responsibilities NEW DELHI: India has called for comprehensive reforms of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), saying all permanent members of a reformed Council must have the same rights and responsibilities, including the power of veto.Delivering India's statement at the United Nations, India's permanent representative Parvathaneni Harish said the veto should be exercised with restraint and must not become a tool for narrow political interests, particularly on matters concerning international peace and security.India also opposed proposals to create a separate category of permanent members without the veto or with fewer powers, arguing that such an arrangement would deepen existing inequalities within the Council."India's position on the veto is principled and well known.

It is aligned with the Common African Position. We reiterate that as long as the veto exists, it must be held by all permanent members of a reformed Council. Fairness and justice demand that all permanent members enjoy the same rights and responsibilities," news agency ANI quoted Harish as saying."A new category of permanent members, with or without the veto, would only further complicate a discussion that is already difficult, and would further entrench the very inequity we are seeking to correct.

Periodic elections and the concept of permanency are fundamentally contradictory," Harish added.Harish said the veto had been used 331 times on around 200 resolutions during the UN's history. He noted that most vetoes, or threats to use them, had come from three of the five permanent members -- China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States."The record of the Veto is stark.

Over the life of this Organisation, the veto has been exercised 331 times on around 200 resolutions. We also note that two out of the five permanent members have not exercised a veto for over three and a half decades, and most of the vetos or threats of vetos have emanated from only three of the P5," he said.He also questioned the effectiveness of accountability measures introduced in 2022, under which the UN General Assembly holds a debate whenever a permanent member exercises its veto.

The continued use of the veto since the mechanism was adopted showed that it had not brought the expected change, he said.Join conversation InsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig Development He also highlighted what he described as an “effective or de facto veto” in the Council's working methods.

Under the practice of consensus, a single member can block presidential statements, press statements and decisions of sanctions committees, sometimes without providing an explanation, he said."The veto is not only what is cast in the open.

There is also the 'effective or de facto veto' that every Council member, elected and non-elected, holds over presidential statements, press statements and the decisions of sanctions committees, where the unwritten rule of consensus allows a single member to hold or block a proposal, most often without explanation," Harish said.

Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app. Aastha Jha is a writer at The Times of India, covering politics. She also writes on business, global affairs, social issues, with a focus on policy, governance and their impact on everyday lives.

Her work brings together reportage and analysis, tracking developments in India and abroad while examining the broader social and economic currents shaping public discourse. '82% Made In India': DAC Clears ₹2.12 Lakh Crore Defence Proposals For Army, Navy, Air Force Why India’s Mega Dam Has Sparked Fierce Protests In Arunachal?

| Siang Project | China's Tibet Plan ‘Chinese Have Upper Hand’: Arunachal Congress Chief Alleges 40-50 Km Incursion Rahul Gandhi ‘Not Guilty’ In 2018 Defamation Case Over Remarks Against Amit Shah | Sultanpur | UP Kharge’s “Modi Ka Baap Bhi Jayega” Remark Sparks Patna Ruckus, BJP Slams Congress over Abuse PM Modi Watches IAF Air Show In Varanasi, Inaugurates Garment Unit Amid Border Row Operation Trident Exposes ₹100 Crore Hawala Trail, 18 Arrested In Northeast Drug Crackdown Operation Trident Exposes ₹100 Crore Hawala Trail, 18 Arrested In Northeast Drug Crackdown Farooq Abdullah Says Pakistan Is Protecting Kashmiris; BJP Calls Remark ‘Act Of Treason’

Actionable Steps for Aspirants & Citizens
  • •Aspirants and citizens are advised to monitor official notices and circulars issued by Times of India National.
  • •Verify all prescribed eligibility criteria, cutoff dates, and authenticated document requirements prior to formal submissions.
  • •Track connected examination timetables, vacancy advisories, and administrative gazettes on SuchnaSetu.
Official Notice Specification
Issuing AuthorityTimes of India National
Topic CategoryWORLD
JurisdictionAll India / National
Publication Date27 October 2026
Connected Government Jobs & Upcoming Exams
Active on SuchnaSetu
Official Source Attribution: Times of India National
View Publisher Source Link

SuchnaSetu provides verified civic and public policy reports based on official notices. Primary publication and copyright remain with the respective government authority or publisher.